Virtue Ethics, Care Ethics and Natural Law Theories Essay Example

Virtue Ethics, Care Ethics and Natural Law Theories Essay Example Virtue Ethics, Care Ethics and Natural Law Theories Essay Virtue Ethics, Care Ethics and Natural Law Theories Essay I have lived in Durham County forty 42 ? years of my life and 2 ? years in Granville County and has had the same thought for all that time. I’ve never thought of any theory to be right besides Religious Ethics. None of my life I paid attention to any other theory besides Divine Command Theory until I took this course. I was satisfied with just believing there was no way possibly another theory could come close to Divine theory. I researched and read other people opinions and I have to think about other people feelings as well. I found that I was being judgmental on my topic of Same-sex marriage. I started trying to think like homosexuals and asked myself would I want to be treated like this? I decided to ask some Gay people questions on why they were this way. As it turns out, a lot of gay people said they couldn’t help it, especially men; some women stated that they were scarred in a heterosexual marriage or relationship and turned to women instead. There were others that stated that they were molested and was confused about their identity. Almost to my disbelief, all of these people I interviewed were in the church. Most served on a ministry in the church and was very much into Christ. Throughout this semester I will be addressing the issue of Same-sex marriage. The existence of Same-sex marriage raises a moral dilemma. A moral dilemma is â€Å"a situation in theory or practice which forces an individual or group to choose between two equally important values, and whichever side one chooses they lose something† (Mundia, 2005). The moral dilemma in this case puts two values at odds. In order to help others we must not judge them and think our way is the only way. Virtue Ethics and Natural Law Theories would not support same sex marriage. Care Ethics would select same-sex marriage. The moral dilemma that arises in this practice is that most younger adults thinks that same-sex marriage is okay and majority of older adults don’t think it’s okay. Virtue Ethics, Natural Law theorist Command would not support this theory, but Care Ethics would say that the practice of same-sex marriage is right. The method of Synthetic Assimilation takes the principles of each of the major extant theories of ethics and applies them to any given moral controversy with a view to determining whether a majority of these theories would conclude that the practice is or would be morally: Right or , (b) wrong or, (c) neither right nor wrong in itself. The first two leading advantages are the strongest point in support of this approach to moral reflection and action. The method of synthetic assimilation takes seriously the views of adherents of the other theories. The elements of a moral argument are to have a reason for holding values and principles.

How Insulin Was Discovered

How Insulin Was Discovered The experiment that led to the initial discovery of insulin- the hormone manufactured in the pancreas that regulates the amount of glucose in the blood- almost didn’t happen. How Insulin Almost Wasnt Discovered For years scientists have suspected that the secret to controlling elevated levels of glucose lay in the inner reaches of the pancreas. And when, in 1920, a Canadian surgeon named Frederick Banting approached the head of the University of Toronto’s physiology department with an idea about finding that secret, he was initially rebuffed. Banting suspected a mysterious hormone was being produced in a section of the pancreas called the islets of Langerhans. He theorized that the hormone was getting destroyed by the pancreas’ digestive juices. If he could shut down the pancreas but keep the islets of Langerhans working, he might find the missing substance. Fortunately, Banting’s persuasive powers prevailed and department head John McLeod gave him lab space, 10 Langerhans hormone before it could be isolated. If he could stop the pancreas from working, but keep the islets of Langerhans going, he should be able to find the stuff!  experimental dogs, and a medical student assistant named Charles Best. By August of 1921, Banting and Best succeeded in extracting hormones from the islets of Langerhans- which they called insulin after the Latin word for island. When they injected the insulin into dogs with high blood sugar levels, those levels dropped quickly. With McLeod now taking an interest, the men worked quickly to duplicate the results and then set about running a test on a human subject, 14-year-old Leonard Thompson, who saw his blood sugar levels lower and his urine cleared of sugars. The team published there findings in 1923 and Banting and McLeod were awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine (Banting shared his award money with Best).  On June 3, 1934,  Banting was knighted for his medical discovery. He was killed in an air crash in 1941.